Shady Methods

Scientists behind the global warming scare have employed very questionable methods of collecting and presenting data to the public; sometimes data is not even shown to the public or other scientists. Basic scientific theory calls for a theory and a critique of that theory by one's peers. By refusing to release data to the public, the scientists at CRU were obviously trying to hide their mistakes from the public. Why exactly were these scientists so adverse to releasing their data to the public? - I mean, for centuries scientists have shared their data with the scientific community, so why should the scientists at East Anglia be exempt? The scientists at CRU believed they could keep their faulty data to themselves, while still convincing the public that global warming is a serious threat. In emails between CRU director, Phil Jones, and his co-workers, it is admitted that data sets were false and needed to be changed. This is absolutely heinous; anyone who reads these emails should be outraged that these scientists have been getting away with these shady methods for so long.

AHhhh! Bell rang bye.